We Don't Need No Population Control
Yes, the world can't
sustain the current level of growth of population forever if everything
else continued to be done in the same way.
The reality is, everything else doesn't continue to be done in the same way.
If we kept on using wood like we did 100 years ago, we would have run out long ago. It's not because we suddenly came to this realisation, it's because we ended up in a position that other materials are better and cheaper to use and used more of that instead. You know, economics. Population growth through birth is also subject to the same economics, these things adjust themselves, it's beautiful.
Starvation is not an issue of a lack of resources today, it's because of the lack of efficiency and distribution and horrible economic atrocities committed by the governments of some third world countries. We produce more food than we consume, and waste some, yet people go hungry in other places.
Just because the problem in these areas would affect less people if there were less of them, doesn't mean the solution would be to make less people.
The reality is, everything else doesn't continue to be done in the same way.
If we kept on using wood like we did 100 years ago, we would have run out long ago. It's not because we suddenly came to this realisation, it's because we ended up in a position that other materials are better and cheaper to use and used more of that instead. You know, economics. Population growth through birth is also subject to the same economics, these things adjust themselves, it's beautiful.
Starvation is not an issue of a lack of resources today, it's because of the lack of efficiency and distribution and horrible economic atrocities committed by the governments of some third world countries. We produce more food than we consume, and waste some, yet people go hungry in other places.
Just because the problem in these areas would affect less people if there were less of them, doesn't mean the solution would be to make less people.
Comments